Krag Collectors Association Forum

What Paul said. (Clint too)

God I hope not - she'll hand the election to Biden. Remember Ross Perot? Hey, Trump may not be "a nice person" but, at his worst, he is SO much better than that demented POS we saw last night that there is no comparison. Another four years of that asshole and it won't matter what state you...

There IS a precedent! We can only hope, AND VOTE!!!!!

Culpeper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:54 pm I do not believe the seller needed to withdrawal the sight. He just need to remove the word unaltered.

Absolutely, but - just to be clear - I did not ask him to. That was HIS volunteered response . . .

OK, Whig, I give up - you've got me outnumbered! :lol: :lol: Seller says he will withdraw the sight - sounds like a careless, but honest, mistake - he was embarrassed.. To keep me off the streets, I sometimes tilt at windmills, as in contacting sellers of bad stuff on GB. Don't know why, I just do. ...

Looks good, Culpepper - super-low rails; quickest way to spot at a distance. I was lucky, got mine MANY years ago, but took a long time to find the right carbine to stick under it.

Aside from being a very poor way to contact me - because I simply/stupidly just don't "see" it - I am also confused by the organization/nomenclature thereof, particularly the difference between "outbox" and "sent". Just minutes ago, I replied to both Whig and Stretch, b...

Ist one on highbid muzzle looks rusted bad into end of barrel. 2nd one is a rifle cut down or barrel changed to 22 inches. Rear sight probably rifle. There are nice ones selling out there. Lots of Krags available. Just have to be picky and watch details especially if you can't handle it in person a...

Chuck, I don't think there's ANYTHING to disagree about, nor did I mean to infer that you were suggesting he change his sight.

On a different note, hope to get the photos of 389182 taken and off to you this week.

Not to quarrel, but if the rifle is in fine condition, with a perfect match of handguard to stock, it is not IMPOSSIBLE that the 1901 is original, so I'd recommend proceding with caution. The rule of thumb USED to be that a 1901 indicated regular army use, and a 1902, militia issuance. That seems to...