Krag barrel dimensions

U.S. Military Krags
Post Reply
waterman
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:29 pm

Krag barrel dimensions

Post by waterman »

I have a chance to acquire a couple of barrels that might or might not be intended for US Krag actions. What are the dimensions of the threaded end of the barrel for a Krag. Since they made upgrades, I assume all barrels were mechanically interchangeable. What are the stub dimensions, max & min diameter, stub length, thread pattern (square?), thread pitch?

I've looked in Mallory & Olson, Brophy, and Farmer's Notes. No one ever bothered with any more than an incomplete diagram. I would appreciate any info.

TIA,

Dick LaVen

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9827
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by butlersrangers »

'waterman' - Frank de Haas gave Krag barrel thread information in his book, "Bolt Action Rifles". I have attached a diagram from his work.

From my experience all U.S. Krag barrels have the same thread dimensions and approach interchangeability.

The breech end of the U.S. barrel began to receive a slight radius at approximately, #218000, in July 1899.

Earlier 'square-cornered' barrels can be slightly beveled with a file, to correctly seat in later actions.
Late barrels, with the 'breech radius', will fit earlier (pre-#218000) actions.

(Also attached, is a photo of Krag threads with the 'square corner' at the breech end).
Attachments
de Haas - U.S. Krag Threads.jpg
de Haas - U.S. Krag Threads.jpg (312.75 KiB) Viewed 1315 times
parts2.jpg
parts2.jpg (72.67 KiB) Viewed 1317 times

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9827
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by butlersrangers »

Some views of Krag barrel shanks:

#1 - Square corner of earlier barrel breech

#2 - The same barrel, slightly 'beveled', to fit a later Krag action

#3 - A model 1899 carbine barrel with rounded corner
Attachments
barrel square-corner.jpg
barrel square-corner.jpg (71.03 KiB) Viewed 1296 times
Barrel flange filed.jpg
Barrel flange filed.jpg (121.06 KiB) Viewed 1296 times
1899 carbine shank.jpg
1899 carbine shank.jpg (72.65 KiB) Viewed 1296 times

waterman
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by waterman »

Thanks very much. Why did the authors of our main sources of information on the Krag fail to include a drawing like that?

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9827
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by butlersrangers »

I guess, there is no perfect book. (That is part of the reason gun forums exist).

Different authors have different interests and focus.

At least Frank Mallory came close in the "KRS", second edition.
Note - Mallory places the change, to the 'rounded corner' on the barrel-breech, at #213000, (rather than my 'off the cuff' guess of around #218000).
Attachments
Frank Mallory - barrel threads.jpg
Frank Mallory - barrel threads.jpg (317.54 KiB) Viewed 1287 times
Last edited by butlersrangers on Mon Jun 28, 2021 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9827
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by butlersrangers »

IMHO - Frank de Haas wrote about single-shot and bolt-actions from a gunsmith point of view.
He looked at the merits and faults of an action, with the idea of possibly re-purposing the action in a sporting rifle.
The information on barrel shanks and threads in his books seems very accurate and useful.

The ordnance drawing that Mallory used in "KRS", on close scrutiny, is a bit of a mystery.

I am not sure what the two numbers in the area, that I have enclosed in a yellow box, signify?
Also, The 'shoulder' in front of the threads and the barrel contour, (in the chamber area), is not how a Krag barrel actually appears.

A Krag barrel measures, approximately, .980 inches in diameter directly in front of the threads. There is no 'shoulder'.
Frank de Haas accurately depicted the reality of a Krag barrel breech-area.
Attachments
Frank Mallory - ordnance drawing.jpg
Frank Mallory - ordnance drawing.jpg (121.42 KiB) Viewed 1282 times

FredC
Posts: 1991
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Dewees Texas

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by FredC »

I am going to say it is a mystery. The 3 Krags I own are in that 1899 area and none show that shoulder. The numbers are a little smudged and if I read them correctly the taper would be backwards compared to any other rifle I know of.
Wild guessing here, he found an drawing of a prototype and someone who thought of making 2 bearing shoulders like the Mausers. Wild guess #2 drawing is for an intermediate stage of production and the shoulder is later turned down. Wild guess #3 he picked up the wrong drawing maybe for a prototype 03?

For Waterman measuring the distance from the chamber end of the barrel to the sight holes would be a good ID for sorting mystery barrels.
Last edited by FredC on Wed Jun 30, 2021 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9827
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by butlersrangers »

Fred - I think you are correct about the drawing that Mallory used. It is probably your #2 idea: some type of 'intermediate machining process/instructions', sort of thing.

The Krag barrel was machined to its final contour from an oversize 'tube'. Those odd dimensions could be from some 'datum line' that disappeared during machining?

Finished Krag barrels don't have or need a shoulder.

FredC
Posts: 1991
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Dewees Texas

Re: Krag barrel dimensions

Post by FredC »

Butlersrangers,
I remember a few years ago a similar drawing was posted with a change to the distance to the shoulder on the cartridge. We could not confirm the change had ever been made. If I remember right it was a rather drastic difference. On a similar rimless case it would have been a drastic change in head space, on the rimmed 30/40 there would have been no head space issue but each round fired would have been fire forming a short case to a longer one, not generally the way you get accuracy. I am wondering if that discussion back then was based on the same defective drawing?

Post Reply