Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

U.S. Military Krags
User avatar
Local Boy
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:03 pm

Re: Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

Post by Local Boy »

I'm glad that the inferior Mauser designed rifle, had in no way, any affect on future U.S. firearm designs!

Long live the Krag!!! ;)

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9900
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

Post by butlersrangers »

Yes, the Mauser System was a 'Dead End', that came to an early demise in the evolution of arms.

It is pretty rare to see any reference to it. ;)Image

Knute1
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

Post by Knute1 »

I can understand the Springfield Armory "bad mouthing" the Mauser with impunity. What I got a kick out of was the way the Mauser was considered a "repeating" firearm like that was a bad thing and that it couldn't be "single-loaded" like that was a good thing to have.

Knute1
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

Post by Knute1 »

Here's another soldier that isn't going to let anybody off the hook for criticizing his rifle. It is in response to another reader of a magazine called "Recreation". He is writing from the Philippine Islands.

img

img

Capt. Frank
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:33 pm

Re: Early Critique of US Magazine Rifle

Post by Capt. Frank »

Curious, Springfield dropped the Krag, and started producing the 1903, a Mauser copy.

Post Reply