Hi, new member requesting help

Sporterized and unofficial modified Krags
chuck0990
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:03 am

Hi, new member requesting help

Post by chuck0990 »

Hi all, I'm new here on this site. I have a 1897 Steyr built Krag and would like a little info on it, more specifically what cartridge and load should be used in it. I did some measurements and narrowed it down to a 6.5x52mm Carcano cartridge. I would also like to know what the value of this rifle would be. Im not interested in selling it, but I am wanting to use it for deer hunting this fall. I do know it is a very straight shooter and I have fired it, but unfortunately, the few shells and casings I had were lost in a fire, and am having a hard time finding what ammo to use in it. Any info you great people could give me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

stamped #s
6.5mm MANN on the barrel, with 19SS just below that at the edge of the wood, barely visible.
STEYR 1897 on the receiver
S/N 38762
31371 on the top of the bolt handle

engraved on the bottom of the bolt handle is a 8 with 7.62 below that

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9908
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by butlersrangers »

NB - 'chuck': Your, 1897 dated, Steyr Krag was built in Austria and started life as a Model 1894 Norwegian Army rifle (in 6.5 X 55mm). Norway contracted with Steyr to build some rifles during 1896 and 1897. The 1897 serial numbers ranged from 30,001 to 39,000. Your bolt may have been replaced, but, the "8 & 762" numbers appear to match the last four digits of your receiver's number, 38,762. Some 'Steyr-Krags' found their way to South Afrika, during the Boer War. These are quite rare and IIRC, not in your serial number range.
It is likely your Krag was rechambered in North America for the 6.5 X 54mm Mannicher-Schoenauer cartridge, after WW2. In the 1950s, Dominion (Canadian Industries Ltd.) 6.5mm M-S ammo was easier to get than 6.5mm 'Swede' or Italian-Carcano.
The chamber-alteration was either done by shortening the dismounted, left-hand threaded, barrel at the breech end and re-chambering or by inserting a chamber 'liner'.
As I advised in an earlier response, it would be a good idea to have this rifle checked by a knowledgeable 'gun person'. (Attached photo of 'Boer' General Tobias Smuts with Model 1894 Steyr made Krag).
Photos of your rifle would be enjoyed by all and may beget more information.Image

chuck0990
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:03 am

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by chuck0990 »

Thank you for the reply. I would like some clarification though, you said my S/N didn't fall within the range you stated? It looks to me like its within tat range, toward the end of the series, or would there be another identifying mark on the barrel perhaps under the forestock?Image

chuck0990
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:03 am

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by chuck0990 »

Also, I measured the chamber with a 1/4" wooden dowl, and it measured exactly 52mm. A 54mm cartridge would be too long.Image

chuck0990
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:03 am

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by chuck0990 »

Is there anything else I could post to find out more?Image

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9908
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by butlersrangers »

NB 'chuck': Your Steyr Krag is in the serial number range of the Norwegian Model 1894 Infantry rifles built in 1897, (#30,001 to #39,000).
I said, it is not in the range of Boer (OVS - Orange Free State and ZAR - South Africa Republic) Steyr Krags, that seem to number below #900 and lack some of the Norwegian markings.

chuck0990
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:03 am

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by chuck0990 »

Another picture, at the edge of the wood, it has 19SS or tats what it looks like, may be 1955.Image

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9908
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by butlersrangers »

Clear pictures of the numbers and markings on your bolt would be interesting.
It appears your barrel has the small 'swastika' marking of a Norwegian steel or barrel producer. This marking is common on early Norwegian Krag barrels and has nothing to do with the Nazis.
There are a couple of filled screw-holes in the groove on the left side of your receiver. It appears a scope was once mounted on this 'sporterized' Krag.ImageImage

User avatar
Parashooter
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:14 am
Location: Kragmudgeon House, CT

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by Parashooter »

Also, I measured the chamber with a 1/4" wooden dowl, and it measured exactly 52mm. A 54mm cartridge would be too long.

And were you measuring from the back end of the chamber to the front of the neck? If so, you have to add a couple of mm for the distance from bolt face to rear of chamber.

In any case, a 1/4" (.250") dowel should slip right through a 6.5mm (.256") bore and is therefore a pretty inadequate tool for measuring chamber length. Try this for a better chamber length measurement -

img
For 6.5mm's, a #1 buckshot (.300") is about right. If you don't have an empty case, substitute a piece of that 1/4" dowel 2" (50.8mm) long. Drop buckshot and dowel into chamber, close and open bolt, push buckshot out with rod, measure length to impression of chamber mouth, including dowel. Use longer dowel if no impression is evident. (No buckshot handy - try oiled, well-chewed gum - yuk!)

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9908
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Hi, new member requesting help

Post by butlersrangers »

NB'chuck': The 6.5mm M-S and 6.5mm Carcano are very similar cartridges. I have heard of a number of Norwegian Krags altered to the once popular and available M-S round. Back in the 1950s, 6.5 Carcano was rare in hunting loads. In fact, M-S brass was used to make reloadable Carcano ammo. The Carcano round is just an unlikely candidate for re-chambering.

You may have to resort to having a chamber cast done to accurately measure your chamber. (I no longer have any 6.5mm M-S brass laying around. Otherwise, I would send you some cases to play with).

Here are some dimensions from one reference:ImageImage

Post Reply