Been working on some handloads for my Krag. Ive found some good loads for 100yds so today I stretched them out to 200yds
They were 10 rd groups shot of a front rest. I shouldve quit at 5rd groups I ended up with a couple flyer/called shots that expanded my groups a bit but over all Iam more than happy with they its shooting
https://imgur.com/a/mUn8X8v
200yd handloads
Re: 200yd handloads
I have been reloading more .30-40 recently but haven't had a chance to go out shooting for a while.
I am working on trying to get closer to 1 MOA at 200 and 300 yards like you are. I'm pretty close to reliably getting 1 MOA at 100 yards but am at 1 1/2 - 2 MOA at 200 and 300 yards.
Looks like you've done quite well. We'll ignore the outliers. You've got a great group there.
What rear sight are you using? I prefer the M1901 with the slide raised for the nice peep holes. (I'm assuming you are using open metal sights.)
Keep up the good work!
I am working on trying to get closer to 1 MOA at 200 and 300 yards like you are. I'm pretty close to reliably getting 1 MOA at 100 yards but am at 1 1/2 - 2 MOA at 200 and 300 yards.
Looks like you've done quite well. We'll ignore the outliers. You've got a great group there.
What rear sight are you using? I prefer the M1901 with the slide raised for the nice peep holes. (I'm assuming you are using open metal sights.)
Keep up the good work!
Re: 200yd handloads
Iam using the 1902 rear sight. I had a spare rear sight so I tried to modify the peep but it didnt pan out so Iam shooting the notch.
I shouldve quit at a 5rd group they were real close to moa but I wanted to go for 10rds. A couple of the flyers I actually called as off shots. I get a kick out people that shoot 3rd groups and then call them sub-moa I like to shoot 5rd groups when I have a load that looks like itll work
I shouldve quit at a 5rd group they were real close to moa but I wanted to go for 10rds. A couple of the flyers I actually called as off shots. I get a kick out people that shoot 3rd groups and then call them sub-moa I like to shoot 5rd groups when I have a load that looks like itll work
Re: 200yd handloads
Gee, almost all of my 1 round groups I shoot are MOA!
You're right. You have to shoot more rounds for real grouping of any significance.
You're right. You have to shoot more rounds for real grouping of any significance.
- butlersrangers
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
- Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan
Re: 200yd handloads
Whig, do you have a 1 inch Gun!
My "one shot groups" are normally .30 inches.
My "one shot groups" are normally .30 inches.
Re: 200yd handloads
A vveeerrrrrrry unsteady hand!?
- psteinmayer
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:31 am
Re: 200yd handloads
Iam using the 1902 rear sight. I had a spare rear sight so I tried to modify the peep but it didnt pan out so Iam shooting the notch.
I shoot the 1902 with the Sgt Peep. I modified mine per CMP rules. The original peep aperture is painfully small at approximately 0.04 dia. I also modified a spare sight using wire gauge drills to 0.07 dia., which helped. However, that was about as large as I could go before damaging the area of the peep. Still, I wanted to get a little bigger so it would be easier to get back on target during the rapid fire phase. So I built up the plate with JB Weld, and then opened the peep up to 0.1 diameter. That really made a difference!!!
Re: 200yd handloads
Paul,
I drilled my M1902 peep larger also but I have still found, with my eyes, the M1901 to work better.
It sure is an individual thing!
I drilled my M1902 peep larger also but I have still found, with my eyes, the M1901 to work better.
It sure is an individual thing!
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 4:56 pm
Re: 200yd handloads
nice group. What was the site setting?
" Should it come to war... we shall place our trust in God and our Long Rifles" Continental Congress
- psteinmayer
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:31 am
Re: 200yd handloads
Paul,
I drilled my M1902 peep larger also but I have still found, with my eyes, the M1901 to work better.
It sure is an individual thing!
Yep... sure is. I actually prefer the 1902, but I think it's because it's what I'm used to cause it's what I've been using the longest. However, I know there are tons out there who prefer the 1901.