Hello all!
I have had 1896 krag rifle for quite a few years now. It was handed down through the family.I really like the old krags and how they look with that big ol clip on the side."unique".Now that Im getting a little older and have more of a appreciation for older rifles and history I thought I would join here and see if can learn more about them.Possibly even find out more about the particular one I have.Thanks for having me here and I hope to learn more from you guys
New Member Just Saying Hi
- Dick Hosmer
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:11 pm
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
Welcome!
First thing would be to post some pictures and a serial number, so that we can start looking for info.
First thing would be to post some pictures and a serial number, so that we can start looking for info.
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
No Problem
I have a 1896
Serial# 35524
22" barrel
30" stock
and I have to figure out how to re-size pics :(
I have a 1896
Serial# 35524
22" barrel
30" stock
and I have to figure out how to re-size pics :(
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
I haven't taken it apart to look for stamps or marks.The only marks being 1896. serial# 35524 US Springfield Armory and the small "c" on the blade sight
Thanks for any help. I've tried to figure it out myself but there seems to be allot of ifs and or buts. My dad got this from his grandfather and was told it has been sporterized. I have no idea.
Thanks for any help. I've tried to figure it out myself but there seems to be allot of ifs and or buts. My dad got this from his grandfather and was told it has been sporterized. I have no idea.
- butlersrangers
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
- Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
Hep: Welcome to the KCA Forum!
You have a nice family heirloom. Your family Krag is a Model 1896 carbine that was built around June, 1896. This is a very desirable model.
Your Krag carbine has some things wrong with it: It appears the stock has been sanded and a 'dove-tail' was filed into the barrel. The model 1896 carbine rear sight (worth around $500) has been replaced with the similar appearing model 1896 rifle sight (worth around $50). The hand-guard (a wooden piece that covers part of the receiver ring and covers the top of the barrel forward to the barrel-band/rear sight protector) is missing. The carbine 'sling-bar' and ring have been cut off.
A hand-guard and complete sling-bar & ring would improve the appearance and value of your carbine.
(p.s. - Your front sight "C" marked blade may be the taller model 1899 carbine blade).
You have a nice family heirloom. Your family Krag is a Model 1896 carbine that was built around June, 1896. This is a very desirable model.
Your Krag carbine has some things wrong with it: It appears the stock has been sanded and a 'dove-tail' was filed into the barrel. The model 1896 carbine rear sight (worth around $500) has been replaced with the similar appearing model 1896 rifle sight (worth around $50). The hand-guard (a wooden piece that covers part of the receiver ring and covers the top of the barrel forward to the barrel-band/rear sight protector) is missing. The carbine 'sling-bar' and ring have been cut off.
A hand-guard and complete sling-bar & ring would improve the appearance and value of your carbine.
(p.s. - Your front sight "C" marked blade may be the taller model 1899 carbine blade).
- butlersrangers
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
- Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
Hep: There are some nice detailed pictures of Model 1896 Carbines on the KCA Website. If you 'mouse-click' on "Visit the KCA Website Today" at the top of this page, it will take you to a Mainpage. 'Click' on the tab for 'photos' and it will take you there.
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
Thank you very much for your time!
Is this the dovetail you revered to?
Is this the dovetail you revered to?
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
I had always wondered what that was for or its purpose? I have looked at the pics you pointed out. Thats why I always felt this was a carbine and not just sporterized.I believed my dad just thought that because it was shorter. If it is indeed a carbine,I would like to restore it the best I can. I did notice the rear sight didn't have the "c" on it so I was thrown off there. The rifle has been in our family pretty much its whole life so I have no idea what happen there. I will admit.....When i was younger i thought ild clean it up a bit and tried to re-blue it (sorry) I know better now.The barrel actually turned out pretty good lol. Thanks again! and if you have any suggestions for restoring it,parts needed or what not I would greatly appreciate it.
- butlersrangers
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
- Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan
Re: New Member Just Saying Hi
Yes, that' the dove-tail, (with the remains of some aftermarket sight base). If the remains were removed, a replacement hand-guard will hide the blemish.
Original parts show up on e-bay, but, are quite expensive.
An original carbine hand-guard is rare. A repro costs about $65 and can be stained to match. (A supplier is in KCA 'classifieds').
A repro 'carbine sling-bar & ring' costs $70 (S&S Firearms). Joe DeChristopher has originals ($95).
There are a couple of parts suppliers in the KCA classifieds, who may be able to help.
If it were my carbine, I would get a repro hand-guard and original sling-bar and enjoy and shoot my carbine. The correct rear sight costs way too much and the rifle sight looks and works "OK".
Original parts show up on e-bay, but, are quite expensive.
An original carbine hand-guard is rare. A repro costs about $65 and can be stained to match. (A supplier is in KCA 'classifieds').
A repro 'carbine sling-bar & ring' costs $70 (S&S Firearms). Joe DeChristopher has originals ($95).
There are a couple of parts suppliers in the KCA classifieds, who may be able to help.
If it were my carbine, I would get a repro hand-guard and original sling-bar and enjoy and shoot my carbine. The correct rear sight costs way too much and the rifle sight looks and works "OK".