Smith Corona 1903A3

Other Firearms
Mike4MSU
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Mike4MSU »

I literally got it last night so I havent had the opportunity. It was a local private sale. I thought it was a good deal so I bought it.

It does seem odd that yours is in pristine shape and yet went through an arsenal rebuild. While the one I bought is very clean and nice, I believe it has been used and yet it escaped a rebuild during its life.

Capt. Frank
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:33 pm

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Capt. Frank »

I have a 1943 Remington '03-A3, it has Lyman front and rear target sights. With match grade 168 grain ammo, it shoots 3/4 inch groups at 300 yards, and 4 inch groups at 600. I hope yours shoots as well.

Whig
Posts: 2003
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Whig »

Sounds great but 3/4 inch groups at 300 yards is unheard of. Must have been a typo. That's like one fifth MOA from open sights. I'd like that on my Robar SR90 sniper rifle. With an 8x80 March Optics scope, I can regularly get 1/2 MOA at 500 yards with 175 grain .308 reloads in my SR90.

Maybe you meant 3/4 inch groups at 100 yards.

I'm anxious to get out and try the 03A3 out to see what I can do. I have gotten down to 1 MOA a few times with my Krag rifle at 200 yards. That's pushing it for me but it's a 120 year old Mil Surp rifle. Still working on the best reloads for the old treasure.

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9880
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by butlersrangers »

Thought I'd "step" into this 1903 - '03-A3 thread:

Bottom: '03-A3 Remington with a R.A. '2-43' barrel. I've had it for over 30 years and fired it a lot in slow-fire matches.
This rifle appeared 'Like New', when I bought it. There are no markings, at all, on the 'scant-grip' stock (?). All metal is a uniform 'Park', with nothing 'blued'.

It is the way it was, when I bought it from a fellow shooting-club member.
He claimed he bought it from the DCM. He never used it and wouldn't even open the action. (I bought the gun and not the story).
There was a time when I could not stand the sight of the stamped parts of a 1903-A3. I have come to 'love' this rifle!

Middle: A (November-1935 dated) Springfield Armory 1903. This lovely Action and Barrel were in a 'sportered' stock and had commercial sights. I "restored" it to 1903 configuration, with original parts, about four years ago.

Top: My 'Bushmaster Carbine - Bantam Sniper' fantasy rifle, (a current fun project in progress). The 1903 action dates from 1921.
The receiver has been drilled and tapped for Weaver bases and the barrel cut to 20 inches. I got the metal from an ugly cheap 'sporter' and am assembling something useful from discarded parts.

If I can find a good deal on a loose '03-A3 barrel, I may try for a '03-A4 'look alike'.ImageImageImageImage

Whig
Posts: 2003
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Whig »

I like that scant grip stock!

User avatar
butlersrangers
Posts: 9880
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Below the Bridge, Michigan

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by butlersrangers »

Thanks 'Whig', I like shooting the 'scant-grip' stock! It works for me.

I developed a kind of 'cupped' grip, when using it for position shooting.

FredC
Posts: 1991
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Dewees Texas

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by FredC »

BR,
I saw feet in reply#13, another one for your rogues gallery. :-)



Whig
Posts: 2003
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Whig »

At least they have clean socks on them.

Baltimoreed
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:42 pm

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Baltimoreed »

Nice looking rifle Whig though I prefer the 03s looks. But then I prefer the Krag over the 03. Form over function I guess. But as long as they all shoot 1/4 moa.

Baltimoreed
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:42 pm

Re: Smith Corona 1903A3

Post by Baltimoreed »

They have heels and toes why not socks? Makes perfect sense.

Post Reply