Page 2 of 2

Re: Model 1896: To rebarrel or not to rebarrel?

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2023 5:38 pm
by Doubly Reincarnated
What were the original bore & groove tolerances?

Re: Model 1896: To rebarrel or not to rebarrel?

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2023 10:16 pm
by P0H0
butlersrangers wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:52 pm 'POHO' - The photo, you question, is an original WW1 period image. The Krag was widely used at U.S. Training Camps during preparation for the Great War.
(p.s. - Plywood has been around for a very long time).

I dunno BR — that photo is super high resolution. I remain skeptical — what kind of a soldier runs around without a sling? Is that sight correct for the 1917 time period?

Yeah plywood has been around for a bit — but it really didn’t take off until much later after WW I.
In 1928, the first standard-sized 4 ft by 8 ft (1.2 m by 2.4 m) plywood sheets were introduced in the United States for use as a general building material.Artists use plywood as a support for easel paintings to replace traditional canvas or cardboard.

Re: Model 1896: To rebarrel or not to rebarrel?

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:06 am
by butlersrangers
Be skeptical, but, lots of old photographs have great focus and resolution.

I believe the Krag, in the photo you are questioning, is a model 1896. The rear-sight is a model 1896 sight.

Re: Model 1896: To rebarrel or not to rebarrel?

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:35 am
by butlersrangers
None of these photos are 'new'.